Bidens buffoonish War on Extremism
The Biden administration announced Tuesday that dudes who cannot get laid could pose terrorist threats due to “involuntary celibacy-violent extremism”. This revelation is part of a new crackdown that identifies legions of potential “domestic terrorists” who federal agencies can scourge and investigate. But there is no reason to believe that the Biden administration’s counter-terrorism and anti-extremism efforts are less of a farce and threat than similar post-9/11 campaigns.
Since the French Revolution, politicians have defined terrorism in order to stigmatize their opponents, a precedent followed by the Biden government’s National Strategy to Combat Domestic Terrorism. The report describes the January 6 clash at the Capitol as a “domestic terrorism” incident, but does not mention that it sparked a mushroom cloud of increasingly far-fetched official allegations. Acting Capitol Police chief Yogananda Pittman told Congress January 6th was “a terrorist attack by tens of thousands of insurgents.” Fewer than a thousand protesters entered the Capitol that day, but apparently every Trump supporter who hurried down the Mall to the Capitol became the legal equivalent of Osama bin Laden. Unfortunately, this “same zip code” standard for guilt could be the prototype for the Biden-era domestic terrorist prosecution.
The Biden report did not label the mobs who burned US post offices in Minneapolis or attacked a federal court in Portland the same “terrorist” label last year. In its litany of terrorist incidents, the report cites “the killing of a peaceful protester in Charlottesville by vehicle” in the 2017 Unite the Right riot, but leaves out the 49 people killed in 2016 by a Muslim who was raised about US foreign policy Pulse Nightclub in Orlando was furious. Perhaps this case was ruled out because the killer was the protected son of a longtime FBI informant and FBI falsehoods frustrated his widow’s subsequent trial. The report also didn’t mention the worst terrorist incident since 9/11 – the Las Vegas carnage, in which a single gunman killed 58 people and injured 900 others. The FBI claimed it could never find a motive for the carnage and its “final report” on the incident was only three pages long. Never mind.
The White House claims its new war on terrorism and extremism is “carefully tailored to address violence and reduce the factors that … violate freedom of expression.” But the prerogative to define extremism includes the power to try to remove certain ideas from acceptable discourse. The report warns that “tales of fraud in the recent parliamentary elections … are almost certain to spur some”. [Domestic Violent Extremists] try to use violence this year. ”If the 2020 election fraud allegations are officially labeled as extremist threats, it could lead to far greater suppression of dissenting votes (with the support of Facebook and Twitter). How will that work better than last fall’s concerted campaign by the media and big tech to suppress all information on Hunter Biden’s laptop before the election?
The Biden government is preparing for war against an enemy that federal agencies have never explicitly defined. According to a March report by the Biden National Intelligence Director’s Office, “domestic violent extremists” include those who “take open steps to violently oppose or facilitate the overthrow of the US government in support of their conviction that the US government is deliberately exceeding “its constitutional authority.” But that was the same belief that many Biden voters held about the Trump administration. Does the definition of extremism depend solely on which party captured the White House?
The report notes that “the Department of Defense is reviewing and updating its definition of prohibited extremist activity among military uniformed personnel”. Bishop Garrison, the head of the Pentagon’s new anti-extremism working group, is Appendix A for the folly of extremist crackdowns on extremism. In a series of tweets in 2019, Garrison, a former Hillary Clinton adviser, denounced all Trump supporters as “racists.” Garrison’s working group will “specifically define what extremist behavior” constitutes for American soldiers. If Garrison purged Trump supporters from the military, the Pentagon could not conquer the island of Grenada. Biden politicians also intend to create an “anti-radicalization” program for those who leave the military. This initiative is likely to result in many leaks and embarrassing revelations in the months and years to come.
The Biden report is terrified by the existence of militias and flirts with the fantasy of banning them across the country. The report promises to investigate “how better use can be made of laws that already exist in all fifty states that prohibit certain private ‘militia’ activities, including … state laws that prohibit groups of people from entering themselves without permission the state government as private military units and state laws that criminalize certain paramilitary activities. ”Most private militia groups are guilty of nothing but yelling and boasting. Plus, many of them are already overflowing with government informants counting on Uncle Sam for regular paychecks.
As part of its anti-extremism arsenal, the DHS funds programs to “improve media literacy and critical thinking” and help Internet users “avoid vulnerability to … harmful content deliberately distributed online by malicious actors”. Do federal agencies have inside information about another Hunter Biden laptop that shows up or what? The Biden administration intends to strengthen Americans’ resistance to extremism by developing “interactive online resources such as online skill-enhancing games.” If the games are as amazing as this report, no one is going to play them.
The Biden report emphasizes that federal law enforcement agencies “play a critical role in responding to reports of criminal and other activity”. “Otherwise about activity”? This is the same standard that ridiculed previous counterterrorism efforts.
Fusion centers are not mentioned in the Biden report, but they are a partnership established after September 11, 2001 between states and local law enforcement agencies to soak up reports of suspicious activity. Seventy Fusion Centers are relying on the same standard – “When You See Something, Say Something” – which a senior civil servant called on Monday in a background appeal for the new Biden initiative. Los Angeles Police Department encouraged citizens to “betray those who stay at bus or train stops for long periods of time while buses and trains enter and exit,” “those who have long conversations on pay or cell phones,” and “joggers, they stand “. and stretch excessively. “The Kentucky Office of Homeland Security recommended reporting” people who avoid eye contact, “” people in places they do not belong, “or houses or apartments that have high traffic” at unusual times arrive and leave again, ”says PBS. Front line reported. The Fusion Center in Colorado “produced a scare public service announcement calling on the public to report harmless behaviors such as photography, note taking, drawing, and charity fundraising as” warning signs “of terrorism,” complained the ACLU.
Various other fusion centers have posted warning labels that “reject federal agencies in favor of state or local authorities” in favor of gun rights activists, anti-immigration zealots, and individuals and groups. A 2012 homeland security report stated that one of the characteristics of potential right-wing terrorists was to “honor the freedom of the individual”. The Constitution Project concluded in a 2012 report that DHS Fusion Centers pose “serious risks to civil liberties, including the right to freedom of expression, assembly, religious freedom, racial and religious equality, privacy, and the right to be to be free from unnecessary government intervention ”. . ”Fusion centers continue to be funded by the DHS, despite their dire record.
The Biden report promises that the FBI and DHS will shortly publish “a new edition of the federal government’s mobilization indicators brochure, which will include, for the first time, potential indicators of domestic terrorism-related mobilization.” Will this latest release be as top heavy as the similar 2014 National Counterterrorism Center report entitled “Countering Violent Extremism: A Guide for Practitioners and Analysts”?
As the Intercept summarizes, this report suggests that “police, social workers, and educators rate people on a scale of one to five in categories such as’ expressions of hopelessness, futility ‘… and’ association with group identity (race, nationality, religion)” , Ethnicity) “… to alert government officials to individuals at risk of engaging in radical violence and families or communities at risk of propagating extremist ideologies.” The report recommended that families should be classified according to their degree of “parenting”. Child Attachment ”and rate places based in part on the“ presence of ideologues or recruiters ”. Former FBI agent Mike German commented, “The notion that the federal government would encourage local police, teachers, medical and social workers to evaluate the communities, individuals and families they serve on their potential to become terrorists , is disgusting at first sight. “
The Biden government believes that inflating the definition of extremists is the surest way to achieve calm at home. In this area, as in so many others, Biden’s team has learned nothing from the folly of the Obama administration. Nobody in D.C. apparently recalls that President Obama consistently denounced extremism and in 2014 called on the United Nations to join his “campaign against extremism”. Under Obama, the National Security Agency assumed that “someone who searches the Internet for suspicious items” is an alleged extremist who has forfeited all constitutional rights to privacy. Obama’s Transportation Security Administration relied on ridiculous terrorist profiles targeting American travelers who yawned, waved their hands, stared down, swallowed suspiciously, sweated, or “made excessive complaints about them.” [TSA] Investigation process. “
Will Biden’s crackdown on extremists end as shamefully as Nixon’s crackdowns nearly 50 years earlier? Tom Charles Huston, Nixon White House Advisor, stated that the FBI’s COINTELPRO program is continuously expanding its target list “from the child with a bomb to the child with a picket sign, and from the child with the picket sign to the child with the opposing candidate’s bumper sticker . And you just keep walking on the line. ”At some point, surveillance became more focused on creating fear than gathering information. FBI agents were encouraged to interview anti-war protesters in an attempt to “add to the paranoia endemic in these circles and further convey that there is an FBI agent behind every mailbox,” as stated in an FBI memo from 1970 was arrested. Is Biden’s caning campaign an attempt to scare their opponents that federal agencies will track their every click of their email and website?
Biden’s new terrorism policy has received much cheer from his fourth tier lapdogs. But a Washington Post Article was annoyed that the government report did not support the adoption of “new legal powers to successfully hunt, prosecute and detain local extremists”. Do the D.C. media elite want every anti-Biden scoffer in the country to be put behind bars? This is typical of the interplay that politicians and the media play with the terms “terrorists” and “extremists”. Regardless of the paranoia on the Beltway, MAGA hats are not as dangerous as pipe bombs.
The Biden report concludes that “strengthening belief in American democracy” requires “finding ways to counter the influence and effects of dangerous conspiracy theories.” But allowing politicians to blacklist ideas they disapprove of will not “restore confidence in democracy”. Extremism has always been a flag of political expediency, and the Biden team, the FBI and their media allies will fuel fears to justify any government crackdown. But what if the government is the most dangerous extremist of all?
James Bovard is the author of Lost rights, Attention deficit democracy, and Public policy hooligan. He is also a USA today Columnist. Follow him on Twitter @JimBovard.
Thank You For Visiting. Please Support This Site By SHARING And Following Us In The Social Networks.