Fauci emails prove he knew about Wuhan research: Senator Paul

0
18


Newly published emails from the White House Chief Medical Officer Dr. Anthony Fauci, proving he knew the Wuhan Institute of Virology was doing a dangerous gain in functional research, Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) Said Wednesday night.

“The emails paint a troubling picture, a troubling picture of Dr. Fauci, who was concerned from the start that he had funded the functional research, “Paul told Fox News about” The Ingraham Angle, “” and he knows it today, but has not admitted it. “

Paul, who has encountered Fauci repeatedly because of various issues related to the pandemic, referred to an email Fauci sent to his senior deputy at the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Hugh Auchincloss, dated February 1, 2020, sent. The email was among 3,200 pages of news to and from Fauci that Buzzfeed News received earlier this week in response to a Freedom of Information Act request.

“Hugh: It is important that we speak this AM,” wrote Fauci. “Keep your cell phone on… Read this paper and the email I am about to forward to you. You will have tasks today that need to be done. ”

Senator Rand Paul called, the emails painted a troubling picture of Dr. Fauci.
Senator Rand Paul called, the emails painted a troubling picture of Dr. Fauci.
Reuters

The NIAID director attached a PDF of a 2015 paper published in Nature Medicine magazine entitled “A SARS-like Cluster of Circulating Bat Coronavirus Shows Potential for Human Evolution”. One of the authors of the paper was Dr. Shi Zhengli, a Wuhan Institute of Virology known as the “Bat Woman” for its work on bat coronavirus. Fauci also sent the paper to the Deputy Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Dr. Lawrence tobacco.

“The paper you sent me says that the experiments were carried out before the reinforcement of the functional break [in October 2014] but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH, ”Auchincloss wrote an email to Fauci later that day. “I’m not sure what that means as Emily is certain that no coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. She will try to find out if we have any distant connections to this work abroad. “

“The paper you sent me says that the experiments were carried out before the reinforcement of the functional break [in October 2014] but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH, ”Auchincloss wrote an email to Fauci later that day. “I’m not sure what that means as Emily is certain that no coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. She will try to find out if we have any distant connections to this work abroad. “

Fauci and other officials have denied knowing what was going on in China and denied that grant funds were used to fund research.
Fauci and other officials have denied knowing what was going on in China and denied that grant funds were used to fund research.
Reuters

“OK. Hold on,” Fauci replied.

“Two weeks ago he was in a committee hearing [Fauci] said they hadn’t funded gain-of-function research, “Paul said on Wednesday night. “I quoted this particular paper … He was worried about it last February, but just two weeks ago he said to me, ‘Oh, that wasn’t a functional research gain.” “

Fauci and NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins have denied lawmakers that any grant money for the Wuhan Institute of Virology was for functional research, which was defined by Fauci as “taking a virus that could infect humans and make it either transmissible and / or pathogenic to humans.” . ”

While both Fauci and Collins previously admitted there was no way of knowing whether researchers in Wuhan were doing undisclosed functional research, Fauci insisted during a home remedies subcommittee hearing last week that such work was “categorically not done “.

“We’re not talking about the Chinese Communist Party,” Fauci told NewsNation on Wednesday evening. “We’re not talking about the Chinese military. We’re talking about scientists who have had relationships [with] for years. “

“There is a lot of evidence that he [Fauci] has a huge conflict of interest and that if this virus is found to be from the Wuhan lab – which it looks like – that there is a huge debt and that he was a huge supporter of funding, ”Paul said. “But to this day he has been a big proponent of the statement, ‘We can trust the Chinese here. We can trust the Chinese scientists, “and I think that’s pretty naive and should really exclude him from his position.”



Source link

Thank You For Visiting. Please Support This Site By SHARING And Following Us In The Social Networks.

Leave a Comment