The only means worth finding a page
Are you wondering, are we a Jeffersonian or a Springsteenian democracy?
I can forgive Bruce for recycling his footage and clothing Western stars Movie in this Super Bowl commercial (pulled by Jeep after a DUI). I’m going to give him a pass for the false accent that nobody in New Jersey or maybe anywhere in the world actually sounds like. And don’t worry if Bruce is sold out or not. Of course he did. He’s always made it clear (see Autobiography and Broadway Show) that he’s primarily an actor playing a character called “Bruce Springsteen”.
What I can’t miss is that Bruce is just wrong. The answer is not that the Americans get to the middle, as Bruce strictly instructs in his advertisement, but that the endpoints on both sides are considered valid positions.
Despite all of the media excitement that Bruce avoided politics for so long, it never did. Very early in his career, Springsteen performed in the No Nukes concerts – not the “Let’s have some nuclear power plants, but not too many” concert. His opposition to the Vietnam War turned into general opposition to America’s jingoistic wars. His stance on economic inequality is the cornerstone of his songbook – you think Nebraska and Ghosts of Tom Joad. He supported BLM before it had its own initials; notice American skin (41 shots) From 2001 onwards?
Bruce has always been very partisan in his politics. He scolded the entire Reagan administration Born in the USA Album. He actively campaigned for four Democratic presidential candidates. In fact, he wasn’t really joking about moving to Australia if Trump were re-elected.
The boss never looked for the middle, as he says, is our target in Jeep advertising. He always chose a side, proud and clear. And that’s more than okay; that’s what America should be about.
The founders made it clearer than a Clarence Clemons saxophone solo that lively debate was vital to their vision of democracy. You have incorporated this into the constitution through the First Amendment, thereby ensuring freedom of speech and the right of assembly. And there is no middle way: It says: “The Congress should do it No Law… ”and with narrow exceptions, the Supreme Court has done so for a few hundred years.
The founders compromised when that was the best they could do. But the thrust was never aimed at a goal of 50:50, rather a simple Springsteen middle way than the balanced Jeffersonian. The founding documents gave very unequal states equal powers. The whole shoddy mess of democracy is full of two-thirds of it and the majority of it. The greatest founding compromise ultimately led to civil war.
When we try to meet in the middle, most people are usually unhappy. in the Roe v. calf The Supreme Court attempted to achieve a theoretical middle ground by allowing near-unrestricted access to abortion in the first trimester, while giving states more room to restrict it in the second and third trimesters. The result was that from the moment the statement was made, one side demanded even freer access to abortion while the other opposed every step. roe is considered a regulated law, but is not a regulated topic.
Compare this to the Supreme Court’s decision to allow same-sex marriage. The court did not try to find some kind of middle. One side of the debate was simply lost, and the country continued to argue about baking cakes for receptions.
Today, in most of our red-blue struggles, neither side understands the process. The goal is no longer to debate and resolve and then move on. Now there is little respect for the other side and no empathy, just contempt and disgust. your Not only is the opinion wrong, it is insane, dangerous and a literal threat to our very survival as a nation. How many times have we heard of the end of the rule of law, the end of democracy, that the Reichstag was on fire during the Trump years?
In the end, we believe that if our candidate loses, acceptance of the election results is voluntary. We’re taking “credible allegations” as the new standard, but only if they produce it, of course our desired successes. Doxxing someone online or attacking them in a restaurant is warranted if they are committing thought crimes. It has gotten to the point where even journalists have joined the scolding and censors to fight the First Amendment today, to silence an opposing view without thinking about what will happen tomorrow to their own ideas, when the wind changes
So Bruce, would you take another dip in that commercial? You can keep the same b-roll pics, including the goofy cowboy cosplay outfit (would a 20 year old have worn that in a Jersey bar by the sea?), But let’s rewrite the script:
We now demand diversity in everything but thinking and don’t see the irony. We run the risk of losing what we have strived for and fought for: respect for different opinions. Don’t work towards the center. Who risked everything for a half-hearted compromise? Has anyone ever washed a rental car? No, you think and mark out a position because you know the other is doing the same. Then you talk it out, argue, trample, write editorials and organize protests. You don’t suppress a language you disagree with, you listen to it and then counter your ideas with better ones.
Then hand it over to the wise tools the founders gave us. They differ from issue to issue. So an election or a vote in the Senate or a court decision. And then you accept that result and respect those whose ideas didn’t make it. This is what we have in common.
It’s not about all thinking the same way. It’s about reaching for a higher rung because we’re not. We all live in one country and in the end we all want a life in which we can provide for families, do honest work, and partake in this prayer for our freedom. The messy, uncomfortable, slow way forward is well marked for us.
Please buy this car too. Patty makes me want to set up a new pool in the house before spring.
Peter Van Buren is the author of We meant well: How I helped lose the battle for the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people,Hoopers War: A World War II novel in Japan, and Ghosts of Tom Joad: A 99 percent story.